又是图片问题，图片问题，被撤稿了

文章因为一图多用而被撤稿的现象已经成为家常便饭了，之前我们已经报道 过非常多这类现象：一图发了三篇文章，这操作666；这篇文章因为一图多用被撤稿了。这次再次报道一次因为一图多用而被撤稿的文章，这篇文章的作者是国内医院的作者，具体情况如下：

文章题目：

Retraction Note to: Attenuation of aortic injury by ursolic acid through RAGE-Nox-NFκB pathway in streptozocin-induced diabetic rats

官网链接：https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12272-020-01262-x

撤稿原因：文章中出现了图4A和图4B分别与另一个作者小组以中文发表的文章中的图1的左侧面板和中间面板相同。

The authors have retracted this article (Xiang et al. 2012) because Fig. 4A and Fig. 4B are same as the left-hand panel and the middle panel respectively in Fig. 1 in an article published in Chinese by another author group (Wang et al. 2009). In addition, Associate Professor Xiaoning Li did not give permission to be acknowledged for pathology work. All authors agree with this retraction.

参考文章：

  1. Wang J, Xiang M, Ling J, Xue X (2009) Effects of ursolic acid on the expression of nuclear factor-k B in the aorta of diabetic rat. Pharmacol Clin Chin Mater Med 25(1):11–14r

  2. Xiang M, Wang J, Zhang Y, Ling J, Xu X (2012) Attenuation of aortic injury by ursolic acid through RAGE-Nox-NFκB pathway in streptozocin-induced diabetic rats. Arch Pharmacal Res 35(5):877–886. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12272-012-0513-0

赞 (0)

相关推荐