乳腺癌术后要不要内乳淋巴结放疗

  对于早期乳腺癌术后患者,胸壁、乳房、区域淋巴结放疗已被随机对照研究证实可以显著减少复发率和死亡率。不过,乳房内侧(内乳)淋巴结放疗能否获益仍然存在巨大争议,既往研究结果互相矛盾,而且当时紫杉类和曲妥珠单抗尚未成为术后全身辅助治疗标准。

  2021年10月25日,《美国医学会杂志》肿瘤学分册在线发表韩国延世大学医院、延世癌症中心、江南世福兰斯医院、成均馆大学三星首尔医院、蔚山大学首尔峨山医院、梨花女子大学医院、首尔大学医院、国家癌症中心、全南大学和顺医院、东亚大学医院、釜山大学医院、启明大学东山医院、嘉泉大学吉医院、抱川医科大学盆唐医院的多中心随机对照研究报告,对区域淋巴结放疗±内乳淋巴结放疗能否提高淋巴结阳性乳腺癌女性无病生存率进行了比较。

NCT04803266: Elective Internal Mammary Node Irradiation in Women With Node-positive Breast Cancer: A Randomized, Phase 3 Trial

  该多中心随机对照三期临床研究于2008年6月1日~2020年2月29日在韩国13家医院开展。入组标准为2008年11月19日~2013年1月14日接受保乳手术或乳房切除术并进行腋窝淋巴结清扫术后经病理证实为淋巴结阳性乳腺癌的女性。排除标准为远处转移患者和接受术前新辅助治疗的患者。根据意向治疗原则进行数据分析。全部患者都进行区域淋巴结放疗以及乳房或胸壁放疗。按1∶1的比例随机接受或不接受内乳淋巴结放疗。主要终点为7年无病生存率,次要终点包括乳腺癌相关生存率、无远处转移生存率、总生存率、毒性反应。

  结果,共计735例女性(平均年龄49.0±9.1岁)被纳入分析。几乎全部患者都接受了术后紫杉类全身辅助治疗,77.2%的HER2阳性乳腺癌患者接受了术后曲妥珠单抗全身辅助治疗。

  中位随访时间为100.4个月(四分位:89.7~112.1)。

  未接受(373例)与接受(362例)内乳淋巴结放疗相比:

  • 7年无病生存率稍低:81.9%比85.3%(风险比:0.80,95%置信区间:0.57~1.14,对数秩P=0.22)

  • 7年乳腺癌死亡率稍高:10.8%比8.4%(风险比:0.74,95%置信区间:0.47~1.16,对数秩P=0.19)

  • 7年无远处转移生存率稍低:83.2%比85.8%(风险比:0.81,95%置信区间:0.56~1.16,对数秩P=0.25)

  • 7年总生存率稍低:88.2%比89.4%(风险比:0.87,95%置信区间:0.57~1.31,对数秩P=0.50)

  • 心脏毒性反应和放射性肺炎等不良反应发生率相似

  不过,亚组分析表明,对于306例(41.6%)肿瘤位于乳房内侧或中央的患者,未接受(153例)与接受(153例)内乳淋巴结放疗相比:

  • 7年无病生存率显著较低:81.6%比91.8%(风险比:0.42,95%置信区间:0.22~0.82,对数秩P=0.008)

  • 7年乳腺癌死亡率显著较高:10.2%比4.9%(风险比:0.41,95%置信区间:0.17~0.99,对数秩P=0.04)

  • 7年无远处转移生存率显著较低:82.3%比91.8%(风险比:0.44,95%置信区间:0.23~0.85,对数秩P=0.01)

  • 7年总生存率稍低:88.5%比93.2%(风险比:0.51,95%置信区间:0.24~1.11,对数秩P=0.08)

  因此,该随机对照临床研究结果表明,内乳淋巴结放疗并未显著提高淋巴结阳性早期乳腺癌术后区域淋巴结放疗患者的无病生存率、乳腺癌相关生存率、无远处转移生存率、总生存率。不过,对于肿瘤位于乳房内侧或中央的患者,内乳淋巴结放疗可能显著获益,故有必要进一步开展更大样本、更长随访的随机对照研究进行验证。

相关链接

JAMA Oncol. 2021 Oct 25. Online ahead of print.

Effect of Elective Internal Mammary Node Irradiation on Disease-Free Survival in Women With Node-Positive Breast Cancer: A Randomized Phase 3 Clinical Trial.

Kim YB, Byun HK, Kim DY, Ahn SJ, Lee HS, Park W, Kim SS, Kim JH, Lee KC, Lee IJ, Kim WT, Shin HS, Kim K, Shin KH, Nam CM, Suh CO.

Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Ewha Womans University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea; Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun, Korea; Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea; Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea; Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea; Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Korea; Bundang CHA Medical Center, CHA University, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.

This randomized clinical trial evaluates the effect of internal mammary node irradiation in regional nodal irradiation on disease-free survival among women with node-positive breast cancer in South Korea.

QUESTION: Does internal mammary node irradiation (IMNI) improve disease-free survival in patients with node-positive breast cancer?

FINDINGS: In this randomized clinical trial of 735 women with node-positive breast cancer, 7-year disease-free survival did not significantly differ between those who were randomized to receive regional nodal irradiation with IMNI and those who were randomized to receive regional nodal irradiation without IMNI. However, in a subgroup analysis of patients with mediocentrally located tumors, the 7-year disease-free survival rate was improved by 10% in the IMNI group.

MEANING: While this randomized clinical trial found no difference in 7-year disease-free survival between the the IMNI and no IMNI groups, the findings of an unprespecified subgroup analysis suggest that including IMNI in regional nodal irradiation might be considered for patients with medially or centrally located tumors.

IMPORTANCE: The benefit of internal mammary node irradiation (IMNI) for treatment outcomes in node-positive breast cancer is unknown.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the inclusion of IMNI in regional nodal irradiation improves disease-free survival (DFS) in women with node-positive breast cancer.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This multicenter, phase 3 randomized clinical trial was conducted from June 1, 2008, to February 29, 2020, at 13 hospitals in South Korea. Women with pathologically confirmed, node-positive breast cancer after breast-conservation surgery or mastectomy with axillary lymph node dissection were eligible and enrolled between November 19, 2008, and January 14, 2013. Patients with distant metastasis and those who had received neoadjuvant treatment were excluded. Data analyses were performed according to the intention-to-treat principle.

INTERVENTIONS: All patients underwent regional nodal irradiation along with breast or chest wall irradiation. They were randomized 1:1 to receive radiotherapy either with IMNI or without IMNI.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was the 7-year DFS. Secondary end points included the rates of overall survival, breast cancer-specific survival, and toxic effects.

RESULTS: A total of 735 women (mean [SD] age, 49.0 [9.1] years) were included in the analyses, of whom 373 received regional nodal irradiation without IMNI and 362 received regional nodal irradiation with IMNI. Nearly all patients underwent taxane-based adjuvant systemic treatment. The median (IQR) follow-up was 100.4 (89.7-112.1) months. The 7-year DFS rates did not significantly differ between the groups treated without IMNI and with IMNI (81.9% vs 85.3%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.80; 95% CI, 0.57-1.14; log-rank P=0.22). However, an ad hoc subgroup analysis showed significantly higher DFS rates with IMNI among patients with mediocentrally located tumors. In this subgroup, the 7-year DFS rates were 81.6% without IMNI vs 91.8% with IMNI (HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.22-0.82; log-rank P=0.008), and the 7-year breast cancer mortality rates were 10.2% without IMNI vs 4.9% with IMNI (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.17-0.99; log-rank P=0.04). No differences were found between the 2 groups in the incidence of adverse effects, including cardiac toxic effects and radiation pneumonitis.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This randomized clinical trial found that including IMNI in regional nodal irradiation did not significantly improve the DFS in patients with node-positive breast cancer. However, patients with medially or centrally located tumors may benefit from the use of IMNI.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04803266

PMID: 34695841

DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.6036

(0)

相关推荐

  • 危险危险危险!乳腺癌放化疗太伤“心”,质子治疗显著降低心脏毒性

    在2021年2月4日的世界癌症日,一则"乳腺癌已成为全球最常见癌症"登上微博热搜,引发了网友们的热议. 世卫组织癌症专家安德烈 · 伊尔巴维表示,2020年确诊癌症的患者高达193 ...

  • 乳腺癌内乳淋巴结放疗是否利大于弊?

    乳腺癌可转移至区域淋巴结,首先是腋窝和乳房内侧(内乳)淋巴结,随后是锁骨上内侧淋巴结.腋窝淋巴结阴性患者的内乳淋巴结转移率仅4%-9%,而腋窝淋巴结阳性患者的内乳淋巴结转移率达16%-65%.因此,对 ...

  • 乳腺癌术后内乳预防放疗的研究进展和临床决策

    本文作者:邓言波 王淑莲等 本文来源:<中华放射肿瘤学杂志>,2019年第12期,第28卷,949-952页. 摘 要 内乳虽然为乳腺癌的区域淋巴引流部位,但术后放疗是否需要照射一直存在争 ...

  • 内乳淋巴结概念及超声扫查要点

    乳房的淋巴网非常丰富,淋巴流向与炎症的扩散和癌细胞转移的途径关系密切,因此具有重要的临床意义.乳房的淋巴液约75%引流至腋窝淋巴结,在汇入锁骨下淋巴结,其次乳腺内侧淋巴液可引流至内乳淋巴结,再汇入锁骨 ...

  • 周仲瑛治疗乳岩(乳腺癌术后)

    标本兼顾,益气养阴,清热解毒,软坚散结,抑肝和胃法治疗乳岩 患者姓名:胡某 女1969-04-18 就诊时间: 2005-01-12 主诉:右侧乳腺癌术后. 现病史:右侧乳腺癌术后,近来右胸疼痛尚属稳 ...

  • 乳腺癌术后放疗指征是什么

    乳腺癌术后放疗指征包括乳腺癌根治术后辅助放疗及保乳术后辅助放疗. 一.乳腺癌根治术后辅助放疗主要适用于局部和区域淋巴结复发高危的患者,放疗指征包括: 1.原发肿瘤最大直径大于等于5cm,或肿瘤侵及乳腺 ...

  • “乳此绽放”名医公益科普答题——三阴性乳腺癌术后遇上胸壁结节

    当三阴性乳腺癌手术后,又发现内侧胸壁结节应该怎么办?这种情况是复发了吗?下一步应该如何应对呢?来自厦门大学附属第一医院乳腺外科副主任杨清默教授对此有他的独到见解~

  • 乳腺癌术后放疗靶区勾画(3)-(2021-8-17)

    NCCN指南解读推荐搜索 乳腺癌术后放疗 乳腺癌靶区勾画 摘要:乳腺癌术后放疗靶区勾画(3)-(2021-8-17) 靶区勾画例A:I期,T1C N0 M0,保乳术后(肿块切除) 例B:IIIB期,T ...

  • 经典图谱55:内乳淋巴结肿大,CT如何识别

    常记溪亭日暮,沉醉不知归路. 公众号:小小医生之有趣的医学 诗情 一双明月贴胸前, 紫禁葡萄碧玉圆; 夫婿调酥绮窗下, 此诗结尾很嬴荡. 前言 很多高手都说:内乳淋巴结肿大对疾病的鉴别诊断价值巨大,但 ...

  • 如何应对乳腺癌术后胳膊“象皮肿”?

    真实案例 56岁的肖阿姨,曾因乳腺癌做了左侧乳房根治术,术后最初还算恢复得不错.不久,她发现左手逐渐肿胀,看上去明显比右手粗好几圈,两只手粗细至少相差八.九厘米,而且肿胀一发不可收拾,整只手从手背到手 ...