对不起！
你们的留言我都是会亲自看的，
昨天很多同学都说，
当天的句子当天给答案。
其实我只是想把这几天的方法论的内容更好的呈现给大家，
因为这些都是你在其他老师那里可能听不到的，
但又是对考研很重要的，
所以就改变了模式，
我心里是期待大家好好夸我的，
但是没想到，很多人都在指责我：
为什么不当天给答案？
把我给搞懵了，
心里就觉得特别的委屈，
我这是把最好的内容给到大家啊，
说实话，
网上指责我的人很多，
各种难听的话都有，
我都不会介意
我除了觉得这些人可笑之外没有任何的感受。
这次我特别想说：去大爷的，老子不伺候了。
今天一天录课的时候都会觉得不爽，
状态特别不好，
但是在回来的路上，
我想明白了，
是我改变了大家的一种习惯，
如果我的习惯突然被改变的话，
我也会觉得不爽，
哪怕你是为了我好，
我也会觉得不爽。
所以：
在这里郑重地给大家道歉了，
后面的句子我一定不会轻易变的，
即使要加新的内容，
我也会单独给出来的。
再次给大家道歉
比如，请问下面这段话中那句话是作者观点？
1.How things have changed! In 1995 the United States can look back on five years of solid growth while Japan has been struggling. 2.Few Americans attribute this solely to such obvious causes as a devalued dollar or the turning of the business cycle. 3.Self-doubt has yielded to blind pride. 4.“American industry has changed its structure, has gone on a diet, has learnt to be more quick-witted,” according to Richard Cavanagh, executive dean of Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government.5. “It makes me proud to be an American just to see how our businesses are improving their productivity,” says Stephen Moore of the Cato Institute, a think-tank in Washington, DC. 6.And William Sahlman of the Harvard Business School believes that people will look back on this period as “a golden age of business management in the United States.”
如何确定作者观点呢?
一个观点句，没有说是谁的观点，那就是作者观点。
没有人认为的观点（few)+观点=作者观点
作者赞同或默认的观点=作者观点
作者明确反对的观点≠作者观点
所以：
1.How things have changed! In 1995 the United States can look back on five years of solid growth while Japan has been struggling. 2.Few Americans attribute this solely to such obvious causes as a devalued dollar or the turning of the business cycle. 3.Self-doubt has yielded to blind pride. 4.“American industry has changed its structure, has gone on a diet, has learnt to be more quick-witted,” according to Richard Cavanagh, executive dean of Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government.5. “It makes me proud to be an American just to see how our businesses are improving their productivity,” says Stephen Moore of the Cato Institute, a think-tank in Washington, DC. 6.And William Sahlman of the Harvard Business School believes that people will look back on this period as “a golden age of business management in the United States.”
所以：
第二句：Few认为的观点=作者的观点！
第三句：没说是谁的观点=作者的观点！
第三句：自我的怀疑屈从于盲目的骄傲。
（=盲目的骄傲代替了自我的怀疑。）
这句话就是对4,5和6观点的评价。
作者就是在diss这三个人的观点！
作者在第二句中就表明了美国经济复苏的原因就是：
1） a devalued dollar
2） the turning of the business cycle
所以昨天的题目答案就是：A选项！
The author seems to believe the revival of the U.S. economy in the 1990s can be attributed to the ________.
[A] turning of the business cycle
[B] restructuring of industry（这是第四句的观点！错！）
[C] improved business management（这是第五句的观点！错！）
[D] success in education（没有提到过教育的问题！错！）
出题人之所以敢这样直接的给答案，
他就是知道你不会找作者观点！
对了美团给了我一些优惠券，
大家可以点击下面的小程序领取！
是不是很有排面！
五一的时候都可以用！
总之福利我给到了，
点赞该你了！
今天的句子：
Some studies show that choosing vegetarian options would only reduce greenhouse gas emissions per person by 3%. Others show a reduction in emissions per person of 20-30%.“Probably the most important thing to point out is that emissions are often viewed as the only metric of sustainability: they are not. Impacts of farming systems on carbon sequestration, water quality, and broader ecosystem services also need to be well considered,” said Matthew Harrison.
思考题：
Which of the following is true according to the text?
A.Some believe going vegan do not reduce emissions.
B.Sustainability can be measured only by emissions.
C.Matthew Harrison is fighting against vegan diet.
D.The literature on the impact of going vegan varies.
感谢参与投票：
词汇突破：
vegetarian 素食
metric 衡量
sustainability 可持续性
carbon sequestration碳封存,
soil acidification 土壤酸化
句子解析：
第一句：
Some studies show that choosing vegetarian options would only reduce greenhouse gas emissions（宾语从句） per person by 3%（状语）.
参考译文：一些研究表明，选择素食只会让人均温室气体排放量减少3%。
第二句：
Others show a reduction in emissions per person of 20-30%.（宾语）
参考译文：另一些研究则显示，人均排放量会减少20-30%。
第三句：
“Probably the most important thing to point out is that emissions are often viewed as the only metric of sustainability: they are not. Impacts of farming systems on carbon sequestration, water quality, and broader ecosystem services also need to be well considered,” said Matthew Harrison.
参考译文：“也许最重要的是要指出，排放量通常被视为衡量可持续性的唯一指标：但它们不是。农业系统对碳封存、水质和更广泛的生态系统服务的影响也需要被充分考虑，”马修·哈里森说。
思考题解析：
A.Some believe going vegan do not reduce emissions.
（一些人相信素食不会减少排放量）
只是有些人认为减少的不多而已，而不是不会减少。
A选项错误。
B. Sustainability can be measured only by emissions.
（可持续性只能由排放量来衡量）
第三句指出不是这样的。
B选项错误。
C. Matthew Harrison is fighting against vegan diet.
（马修·哈里森正在对抗素食）
没有说，所以错！
C选项错误。
D. The literature on the impact of going vegan varies.
(关于素食的影响的文献差别很大)
第一句说：一些研究表明，选择素食只会让人均温室气体排放量减少3%。
第二句说：另一些研究则显示，人均排放量会减少20-30%。
所以，关于素食的影响的文献差别很大，D选项正确。
文章来源背景和来源：