贾康:金融服务实体经济有八个“势在必行”

Eight Imperatives to be done by Finance inServing the Wider Economy

Jia Kang

Jia Kang, First President and Chief Economist of China Academy of New Supply-side Economics, Research Fellow in Chinese Academy of Fiscal Sciences, Beijing, the People’s Republic of China

Abstract
To deepen financial reform in China, we must grasp the overall situation, reform thoroughly to correct the wrong tendency of being distracted from the intended purpose, supervise with a large system, and establish a large framework of combining commercial finance with policy finance. Eight imperatives for the finance to be done in serving the wider economy are as follows: First, it is imperative to clearly understand and grasp the work of supporting the upgrading of the wider economy with financial innovation. Second, it is imperative to form a seamlessly connected financial and capital market through a diversified financial product system. Inevitably, there will be a monopoly in the financial field, which should not be excessive. Excessive monopoly must be resolved by reform. Third, diversified reform should emphasize the optimization of the structure, and it is imperative to increase the proportion of China’s direct finance. Fourth, it is imperative to consider strategically matching healthy and sustainable policy financing systems to financial innovation in diversified development. Fifth, it is imperative to conduct the third industrial revolution represented by the connection of Internet in financial innovation. Sixth, it is imperative to conduct the innovation in the PPP mechanism in the field of investment and financing. Seventh, it is imperative to create conditions for the realization of RMB convertibility under the capital account in the process of RMB internationalization (self-dismantling the firewall). Eighth, it is imperative to grasp the relationship between development and regulation in financial innovation.

Key words: finance reform, eight imperatives

SSRG International Journal of Economics and Management Studies (SSRG-IJEMS) – Volume 7 Issue 2 – Feb 2020

I. INTRODUCTION

Under the guidance of the spirit of the Nineteenth National Congress of the CPC and financial work conference, the theme falling into economic life is how finance can better serve the wider economy. The Financial Working Conference particularly emphasized serving the real economy. It also emphasized that multiple parties shall coordinate the measures to prevent risks and deepen financial reform. The changes in real life are, first of all, an emphasis on the overall situation, thorough reform to correct the wrong tendency of being distracted from the intended purpose, the supervision of a large system and the institutional adjustment in the financial system, that is, establishing the financial stability and development committee to administrate the central bank (The People’s Bank of China) and two commissions (China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission and China Securities Regulatory Commission). In addition, there is a large framework. While guarding against the risks, it is also necessary to systematically build a coordinated supporting system of commercial finance and policy finance by deepening the reform of the financial system.
Specifically, the financial services serve the real economy.

II. IT IS IMPERATIVE TO CLEARLY UNDERSTAND AND GRASP THE WORK OF SUPPORTING THE UPGRADING OF THE WIDER ECONOMY WITH FINANCIAL INNOVATION

In real life, the important role of finance has been repeatedly emphasized. In the 1980s, Deng Xiaoping said that finance is the core of the modern economy. I think it can be understood that finance is the cardiovascular system of the national economy. It can be regarded as having a core position as it promotes the allocation of various factors in the economy and society with the effective supply medium of the finance. However, no matter how important the core role of the cardiovascular system is, it is also necessary to serve the health and sustainable development of the entire living organism. The starting point and destination must be to serve the real economy. But in reality, if it is not handled properly, the international financial crisis and some domestic problems with crisis phenomena illustrate that the core may become hollow. From our own domestic experience, for example, in the 1990s, all parties paid great attention to the development of Wenzhou. After the turn of the millennium, consensus was reached that in the competition of Wenzhou model and southern Jiangsu model, Wenzhou model won, and the county economy and the private economy were so prosperous. However, a “runaway incident” later appeared, revealing that the local financial ecology has not achieved the state that it was supposed to be highly valued in the past. Due to various reasons, conventional finance has been marginalized. In real life, the development of Wenzhou’s private enterprises had to be financed by costly usury loans and was vulnerable. Under the impact of the external financial crisis and its own contradictions, the capital chain was broken. Almost at the same time, dozens of large local enterprises in Wenzhou encountered the broken capital chain and the entrepreneurs had to run away to avoid the calamity. At that time, the emergency measure was taken to cope with the local crisis and efforts were made to calm it down. After the matter basically subsided, it became clear that due to the marginalization of conventional finance in finance and the leading role of usury, the capital chain finally broke down. Then the upgrading and development of the real economy in Wenzhou was hindered and the industry was hollowed out. At a certain stage, a good situation has been missed. Originally, the private enterprises developed well in Wenzhou, but had to make drastic adjustment to digest the adverse factors. From a global perspective, if similar problems cannot be prevented and resolved well, China’s post-modernization advantage cannot be realized as expected. There are such problems in the Yangtze River Delta. If the similar problems reappear in Pearl River Delta (It was thought that Dongguan may had the problem. Fortunately, Dongguan has survived.), there may be domino effect, and China may encounter the problem of mid-income trap. How to prevent the core from becoming hollow is actually to make use of financial innovation and development to promote the upgrading and development of the real economy. After China became the world factory, it will turn from being made in China to being created in China. The upgrading of the real economy is the most critical power to support the high quality development of the national economy, and finance must serve this power.

III. IT IS IMPERATIVE TO FORM A SEAMLESSLY CONNECTED FINANCIAL AND CAPITAL MARKET THROUGH A DIVERSIFIED FINANCIAL PRODUCT SYSTEM

In the face of reality, I think I have to admit that while financial reform has achieved a series of results and a lot of progress in China, there is still an excessive monopoly in the financial field. Inevitably, there will be a monopoly in the financial field, and its barriers to entry are high, but monopolies should not be excessive, and excessive monopolies must be eliminated. In the discussion many years ago, the leaders of the central bank and some large banks and financial institutions were unconvinced, saying that China already had more than 1,000 banks and financial institutions competing every day, how can we say that there is a monopoly? There are more than 300 million people in the United States, and more than 20,000 banks and financial institutions while there are 1.4 billion people in China and a few thousand banks and financial institutions. But this is not the key. The key is that in real life, the profiting characteristics of China’s financial industry are too obvious. From the data point of view, among the listed companies in China, the top 10 ranking from the highest level of income are all banks. While in the United States, there are only three banks in the top ten. Among the various A-share listed companies in China, the industry with highest profit level is the banking industry, and the second one falls to a very low level, while the industry ranking in the first in the United States is high-tech companies, and the second one is the banking industry. In the United States, the level of profitability from the first to the second to the third and thereafter is a smooth decline. This can indicate that there is a huge difference between China and the United States in the flow of factors. If there is sufficient flow of factors, it is impossible for banks to always stand out and have such a high ability to make money. In the past few years, Mr. Hong Qi, the president of Minsheng Bank and now the chairman, said a word that the bank was embarrassed to make money. This is because there is excessive monopoly. Such excessive monopoly results in insufficient diversification of financial institutions, and financial products cannot be fully diversified in competition to meet various needs. Therefore, it is necessary to deepen the reform of the finance to optimize the structure of financial system under the concept of supply-side reform. Thus, different financial institutions should be established as much as possible to provide a variety of products to meet the financing needs of market entities represented by various types of entity economy in social life. Such a sufficient supply of financial products should be able to marginalize and squeeze out Wenzhou-style usury. It cannot be imagined that there is no usury at all, but at least it is necessary to prevent the “hidden rules from substituting the clear rules”, which lead to the recurrence of running events. There have been some explorations in the past. For example, for small loan companies, we emphasize that they are capital financing and self risking, and should be developed more. In the middle of this, a form of “medium-interest loan” is more suitable to provide financial products for SMEs. The development direction should be a pattern formed by low-interest loans and medium-interest loans, crowding out usury loans and eliminating them. In life, we can also observe that the source of the “incident of humiliating mother” in Shandong in the past two years is still due to usury. This kind of thing seems likely to affect the whole body. If handled improperly, economic problems will be socialized and politicized.

IV. IN THE DIVERFIFIED FINANCIAL REFORM, IT IS IMPERATIVE TO EMPHASIZE STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION TO INCREASE THE PROPORTION OF DIRECT FINANCE UNDER THE CONCEPT OF FINANCE

The proportion of direct finance in China is still very low, and direct financing formed by the stock and bond markets accounts for only about 20%. According to international experience, the direct finance in the United States, which is the number one strong country and represented by the market economy, accounts for about 80% . In contrast, of course, we cannot simply copy the experience data in the US. However, specifically, there are indeed problems in the low proportion of direct finance. Currently, there is discussion on the macro leverage ratio. The ratio of China’s broad money supply M2 to GDP has reached nearly 250%. It is related to the large number of indirect finances in which loans are entered one by one and M2 is repeatedly calculated. Moreover, these loans have a tendency of becoming short-term loans in recent years. For M2, everyone is worried that the wolf is coming, but the price is not shocked. Since 2010, the CPI has been fluctuating slightly in the range of 1 to 2. The PPI had a negative growth for a term as long as 54 months and finally turned to a positive value around July and August in 2016. It is now in a downturn again. The central government turned “de-leverage” into “stable leverage”, which is related to China’s specific national conditions and financial structure. At the same time, it should also be noted that a higher proportion of direct finance will be more conducive to the flow of factors, thus bringing positive effects to market competitiveness and generating additional factors, which are helpful for the entrepreneurial talents. Under indirect finance, the entrepreneurs need to seeking banks, while under direct finance, they can go to the stock market, bond market and private equity to rely on the release of relevant information to the audience to correspond to resource allocation. Therefore, from the perspective of the development direction, although we cannot simply imitate such a high proportion in the United States, at least 20% of the proportion in China must be significantly increased. Financial reform must strive for a series of specific measures to achieve the result of increasing the proportion.

V. IT IS IMPERATIVE TO MATCH HEALTHY AND SUSTAINABLE POLICY FINANCING SYSTEMS TO FINANCIAL INNOVATION

Financial diversification should be considered strategically. If China matches the policy-based financial system with the commercial financial system, it can promote China’s development unconventionally. Although the policy finance is supplementary in form, it has great global significance and challenge in strategy. If China’s modernization is to rely on China’s unconventional development, in addition to an effective market, an active and limited government is required. How can we realize unconventional development? Many ideas must be focused on policy financing, which is also a double-edged sword. If handled improperly, it will bring chaos. Referring to the experience of the old, advanced economies such as the United States and Britain, and the experience of Japan after World War II, no one can ignore policy finance. China has also explored in this regard, but then retreated after a while. After the 18th National Congress of the CPC, the concepts of policy finance and development finance were re-proposed. It can also be noticed now that the green finance, inclusive finance, grassroots finance emphasized by the leadership, financial support for targeted poverty alleviation, etc., all have a strong policy colour. They are a system different from commercial finance . International experience and our own experience have shown that in pursuit of extraordinary development in China, we must master strategically to build a healthy and sustainable policy-based financial system, of which finance is backup support as it involves with the function and role of finance. The mechanism used by the United Kingdom and the United States to support small and medium-sized enterprises is to use budget funds for discounts and credit guarantees. China is also citing these experiences. In recent years, local governments have increasingly valued industry guidance funds and PPPs that have been working hard to innovate and develop these years, which have vivid colours of the policies. Under the operation of dual-track system, the mechanism supported by the finance are “policy funds, market-oriented use, professional management, and leveraged amplification”. In order to make it sustainable, it is necessary to establish a constraint system of multiple supervisions and audits so as to prevent rent-seeking and corruption as much as possible, and to standardize the selection of supported objects. Although the applicant requiring for support cannot be all supported, the supported object selected in each round should be the target of policy finance in accordance with its positioning. If the supported are selected according to “relationship”, the applicant that should not be supported obtain support, then this system will not be sustainable.

VI. IT IS IMPERATIVE TO CONDUCT THE THIRD INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION REPRESENTED BY THE CONNECTION OF INTERNET IN FINANCIAL INNOVATION

Alibaba can use big data, cloud computing and software design in computer systems to continuously grant small loans with zero manual intervention, expanding the commercial and financial boundaries. Of course, they will also encounter certain limitations. For example, online big data will automatically determine the risk and decide whether to lend or not. The electronic traces of the applicant and related information with his relatives, friends and major friends are exhausted. However, if the applicant works in agriculture in a remote rural area without any electronic traces or past economic information, then he cannot directly get small loan support. After cultivating some electronic traces of their economic behaviour, Taobao users are getting more and more easily to get the support of small loans. Of course, we must realize that commercial finance has expanded its borders with the support of new information technology, but it cannot replace policy financing, which needs to cover another group of people. On the whole, it is necessary to affirm that the Internet + brought by such technological innovation is of great significance and can reduce the risk and financing costs in the entire financial system.

VII. IT IS IMPERATIVE TO PROMOTE PPP MECHANISM INNOVATION IN FINANCIAL INNOVATION

In recent years, there have been a lot of discussions on PPP in society. Some people even said that PPP should be suspended, and some journals even said that we will not publish PPP articles in the future. But in fact, in China’s extraordinary innovation and development, the unique contribution of PPP is undeniable. After the major developments in the past few years, it has been adjusted downwards and steadily, which is in line with the law of wavy development. But it will never be called stop. Certainly, after two or three years of relative stability, the attitudes of the relevant departments have become clear. To support its sustainable and healthy development is an innovation focus of China. Restricted by the limited financial resources of the government, it is necessary to use the government’s financial resources in clever manoeuvres like accomplishing a great task with little effort. This is a necessary innovation. In the form of PPP, there are many things that can be done in China. From Beijing Metro Line 4 to Line 16 rail transit apps, and also public infrastructure such as “Bird’s Nest”, a large number of urban and rural projects in China can be done in PPP. For the problem of serious shortage of parking lots and parking spaces in Beijing, it can be connected with PPP. Many residential districts need to install elevators on old buildings. This is an upgrade that is generally done after entering an aging society with the improvement of people’s living standards now. It is entirely possible to connect PPP to such matters. Relying on the government in accordance with the old method, I do not know how many years will the will be achieved. It can be speeded up and optimized with PPP, which is directly related to the improvement of people’s livelihood and the quality of social life and development environment.

VIII. IT IS IMPERATIVE TO CREATE CONDITIONS FOR THE REALIZATION OF RMB CONVERTIBILITY UNDER THE CAPITAL ACCOUNT

In the process of RMB internationalization, which is pushed from the existing peripheralization to an increasingly high level of internationalization, it must be determined that when conditions are available, we should “self dismantling the firewall” to realize the convertility of RMB under the capital account. It can be clearly seen that it is unimaginable for China to achieve modernization, but it will indeed create risk pressure. If the similar situations in the Asian financial crisis and the world financial crisis happen again, then the role of the firewall will be lost. We will be able to cope with the impact of hot money from Soros-style financial tycoon when we have the ability to face the free flow of hot money.

IX. IT IS IMPERATIVE TO GRASP THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DEVELOPMENT AND REGULATION

In many new areas of financial innovation, if you do not know how to standardize, you must first give the flexibility of trial and error for innovation. The big logic is to first put out “standards in development” and allow trial and error in development. Then it is necessary to use standardized development to prevent risks when it is necessary to take action in the future. In China, typically, the private enterprises in Internet + is rushing to the front line. WeChat and Alipay, which can be used for scan payment, are in a competitive relationship, but then combined together, enabling the Chinese public generally go across the popularization stage of credit cards and obtain financial services very conveniently. Ordinary people scan the code on the phone on the street to call a taxi, buy pancake and promote economic prosperity. However, WeChat once encountered a difficult situation. Tencent once wanted to sell WeChat and no one took it. China Mobile has also launched Fetion, which is supported by the same original American technology, but it is difficult to pass through the barriers where money must be spent. At that time, someone told WeChat that it would cause trouble for the government. Prime Minister Li Keqiang said a word, “prudent and tolerant”. Let’s take a look and give flexibility. After overcoming the bottleneck, this WeChat soared into the sky. Not only did it have convenient payment services, but it also provided ordinary people with access to financial management and financial services at the grassroots level. This was a service that the financial industry could never dream of. These things together inspire us: allowing trial and error and giving flexibility must be ranked first. Then take the norm when the risks are clear. For example, P2P, later when the situation like stopping operating occur, it is time to take a shot and do a good job of preventing risks.

附中文版本:

贾康:金融服务实体经济有八个“势在必行”

深化金融改革,首先应把握好大局观,正本清源纠正脱实向虚的错误倾向,还要有大系统的监管,以及商业性金融与政策性金融相结合的大框架。而金融服务实体经济具体的八个势在必行表现在这些方面:
第一,要非常明确地认识和把握好以金融创新支持实体经济升级的工作势在必行;
第二,通过多元化金融产品体系形成无缝对接的金融资本市场势在必行,金融领域必然有垄断,但是垄断不能过分,过度垄断一定要依靠改革来消解;
第三,多样化的改革中应强调结构优化,提高中国直接金融的比重势在必行;
第四,多样化发展中在战略高度上考虑使健康可持续的政策性融资体系匹配金融创新势在必行;
第五,以金融创新中对接互联网为代表的第三次产业革命势在必行;
第六,创造条件,在人民币国际化过程中,择机实现人民币资本项目下可兑换(“自拆防火墙”)势在必行;
第七,投融资领域的PPP机制创新势在必行;
第八,在金融创新中把握好“发展和规范”的关系势在必行。
在中央十九大精神和金融工作会议指导下,落在经济生活中的主题是金融如何更好地服务实体经济。金融工作会议特别强调服务实体经济,又强调多方协调配合防范风险的措施和深化金融改革。现实生活中的变化,首先是强调大局观,正本清源纠正脱实向虚的错误倾向,还要有大系统的监管,在金融领域设立稳定协调委员会下辖一行两会,还有大框架:在稳字当头对风险加以防范的同时,要以金融系统深化改革来系统化构建商业性金融和政策性金融的协调配套体系。
具体而言,金融服务实体经济,第一是要非常明确地认识和把握好以金融创新支持实体经济升级换代的工作势在必行。实际生活中,已经反复强调金融的重要作用,80年代邓小平说金融是现代经济的核心,我认为可理解为金融是国民经济运行的心血管系统,它以金融的有效供给媒介、带动各种各样要素配置于经济社会,可以认为是具有核心的地位,然而不论心血管系统的核心作用多么重要,也是要服务于整个生命机体的健康和可持续发展,出发点和归宿必须是服务于实体经济。但是现实中如处理不好,国际金融危机和国内带有危机现象的一些现实问题都告诉我们,核心是有可能变成空心的。从国内我们自己的经验来说,比如在90年代各方曾高度关注温州发展,千年之交以后形成共识认为温州模式和苏南模式竞争中间,温州模式胜出了,县域经济、民营经济这么繁荣,但是后来却出现了“跑路事件”,暴露出当地金融生态没有实现过去认为应该给予高度评价的状态,由于种种原因常规金融被边缘化了,实际生活中不得不以成本很高的高利贷金融来维持温州民营企业的发展局面,其脆弱性是在外部金融危机压力冲击下,加上自身的矛盾凸显,合在一起使资金链断裂,温州地面上可称为当地大型企业的几十家,几乎同时出现资金链的断裂而企业家为了避祸不得不跑路。当时对此局部性的危机是采取了应急措施,努力加以平息,等这个事情基本平息下来,看清楚的是,由于金融方面常规金融边缘化、高利贷唱主角,最后资金链断裂,随后暴露的是温州自己实体经济的升级发展受阻、产业空心化,在一个阶段上痛失好局——本来温州有民营企业发展的很好局面,却不得不做大幅度调整消化不良因素。在全局来看,类似的问题如果不能得到很好防范和解决,中国现代化后发优势是不能如愿发挥出来的,长三角有这类问题出现,如果珠三角再出现(一度曾经看东莞会怎么样,好在东莞后来挺住了),形成多米诺骨牌的效应,中国或将面临中等收入陷阱的问题。核心如何防止变成空心,确实是要落在金融发展创新发展必须能够体现出使实体经济能够升级发展,中国到了世界工厂以后,由中国制造走向中国创造,实体经济升级换代,是支撑国民经济高质量发展最关键的力量,金融必须服务于这种力量。
第二,通过多元化金融产品体系形成无缝对接的金融与资本市场势在必行。面对现实来说,我认为不得不承认,金融改革在中国取得一系列的成果、很多的进展的同时,仍然存在金融领域中过度的垄断。金融领域必然有垄断,它的准入门槛高,但是垄断不能过分,过度垄断一定要消除。多少年前讨论中,央行和一些大银行金融机构的领导就很不服气,说中国已有一千多家银行和金融机构,天天在竞争,怎么还说我们垄断?数量上美国三亿多人有两万多家银行与金融机构,中国14亿人只有几千家,但这还不是关键,关键在于实际生活中来看,中国金融行业的赚钱获益特征太明显了:数据上看,中国上市公司里从收益水平最高的往下排,前10位清一色全是银行。以美国方面的情况作对比,美国前十位中只有三家银行;中国的各个行业在A股上市公司中,盈利水平最高的是银行业,第二位一下子落到很低的水平上,而美国第一位是高新科技企业,第二位是银行业,从第一第二到第三和其后,盈利水平是平滑的降低过程。这可以说明,要素流动性上,中美之间有巨大的差异,如有要素较充分的流动,不可能让银行总是鹤立鸡群有如此高的赚钱能力。前些年民生银行行长、现在是董事长的洪崎先生说过一句话,银行赚钱赚得都不好意思了。这就是因为有过度的垄断。这样的过度垄断造成金融机构多样化不足,金融产品也不能够在竞争中充分的多样化,去适应各种不同的需求,所以必须通过金融深化改革,来使金融体系能够在供给侧改革的概念下结构优化,尽可能充分形成不同的金融机构,提供多种多样的产品,来适应社会生活中各种类型的实体经济代表的市场主体的融资需求。这样充分的金融产品的供应,应该能够把温州式的高利贷边缘化、挤出去。不能设想一点都不存在高利贷,但至少要防止“潜规则强制替代明规则”而引出跑路事件这样的教训重演。过去已有一些探索,比如小额贷款公司,我们强调它是资本金融资、自担风险,应该得到更多的发展,现实中间是以“中利贷”的形式形成较适合中小企业的金融产品,这些应能更多提供出来。发展方向,应该是由低利贷和中利贷形成一个格局,把高利贷挤掉、摒除出去。生活中我们还可以观察一下,前两年山东“辱母事件”,源头还是因为高利贷。这类事看起来有可能牵一发动全身,处理不好经济问题会社会化、政治化。
第三,金融多样化的改革里面,从大的结构来说,强调结构优化提高金融概念下直接金融的比重势在必行。中国直接金融比重还非常低,股、债市形成的直接融资只占20%左右。国际经验看,头号强国、市场经济代表性的经济体美国直接金融占80%左右。对比之下,当然不能简单照搬美国的经验数据,但是具体看直接金融比重过低确实有问题。现在都在谈论宏观杠杆率,中国广义货币供应量M2和GDP比值已经高达近250%,与大量的间接金融以贷款方式一进一出在重复计算M2有关,况且这些年贷款还有短期化的倾向。为M2大家担心狼来了,但是物价波澜不惊,2010年以来CPI一直是1到2的区间非常合乎意愿地小幅波动,PPI曾长达54个月负增长,2016年7、8月间终于转为正值,现在又在低迷状态。中央把“去杠杆”转变为“稳杠杆”,这跟中国具体国情和金融结构是有关的。同时也应注意到,直接金融比重更高,将更有利于要素流动中企业家才能的更好发挥,可以更多使市场竞争性带来正面效应,产生加分的因素。间接金融更多是靠企业家求银行,直接金融则是企业家可以跑到股市、债市和私募领域依靠以自己相关信息对受众的发布,去对应到资源配置上。所以从发展方向上看,虽然不能简单模仿美国这么高的比重,但是至少要把我国20%的比重明显地往上提升,金融改革要争取相关的一系列具体措施来达到提高比重的结果。
第四,金融多样化发展中应该从战略高度上考虑,使健康可持续的政策性融资体系匹配的金融创新势在必行。中国要使政策性金融体系匹配了商业性金融体系,才能守正出奇地支持中国发展。形式上辅助性的政策性金融战略层面上却有重大的全局意义和挑战性。中国的现代化要依托于中国的超常规发展,有效市场旁边必须加上有为、有限的政府,如何守正出奇?很多主意必须打在政策性融资方面,而它又是双刃剑,处理不好会乌烟瘴气。但是看看美国、英国等老牌的、前面的发达经济体的经验,以及二战以后日本的经验,没有一家可以忽略政策性金融。中国也在这方面有所试探,一段时间后又后退。十八大后,重新提出政策性金融、开发性金融的概念。现在也可注意到,领导层强调的绿色金融、普惠金融、草根金融,对精准扶贫的金融支持等等,这些无一例外具有浓厚政策色彩的金融,是一个有别于商业性金融的体系。国际经验和我们自己的经验都表明,在中国追求超常规发展,必须在战略层面掌握好打造健康可持续的政策性金融体系,其中财政是应有的后盾支持,因为这必然涉及财政的功能作用。英国、美国支持中小企业的机制是运用预算资金做贴息、信用担保,中国也在引用这些经验,近些年地方政府还越来越看重产业引导基金,以及这些年在努力创新发展的PPP,这里面的政策色彩都非常鲜明。双轨运行下,财政支持的机制是“政策性资金、市场化运用、专业化管理、杠杆式放大”。为使之可持续,要建立多重监督审计的制度约束,最大限度地防止设租寻租和腐败之风,对支持对象要有规范化的遴选,希望得到支持的对象虽然不能都得到支持,但是每一轮挑选出来应该都是政策金融按照定位应该去支持的对象。如果搞成乌烟瘴气的靠“关系”,不该得到支持的依靠拉关系处关系得到支持,这个体系就不可持续。
第五,金融创新中对接互联网为代表的第三次产业革命势在必行。阿里公司可以在计算机系统里面利用大数据、云计算、软件设计,零人工干预地不断批出小额贷款,把商业金融边界扩大了。当然也会碰到一定的局限,比如说网上靠大数据自动判断风险决定放贷不放贷,申请对象的电子痕迹,与他的亲友、主要朋友间的相关信息是一网打尽的,但如果是偏僻农村区域务农的申请者,没有什么电子痕迹和以往经济信息,就无法直接得到小贷支持。淘宝户在培养了一些自己经济行为的电子痕迹后,则越来越容易得到小贷支持。当然要肯定商业性金融在新的信息技术支持下扩大了边界,但是还不能取代政策性融资,需要覆盖另外一部分人。总体上需要肯定,这样的科技创新带来的互联网+的意义重大,可以降低整个金融系统里的风险度和融资成本。
第六,在金融创新中推进PPP机制创新势在必行。近年对PPP,社会上有很多议论,有些人甚至说PPP要被叫停,有的期刊甚至说,我们以后不发PPP文章了。但其实中国守正出奇的创新发展中,PPP独特的贡献是不可否定的,有了前面几年的大发展后,往下调一调、稳一稳,符合波浪式发展的规律,但是绝对不会叫停。果然,这两三年相对稳一稳后,各有关部门态度又很明朗,要支持其可持续健康发展,这是中国的一个创新重点。政府有限财力制约之下,必须把政府财力“四两拨千斤”地运用,这是必选的创新事项。以PPP形式,中国可做的事非常多,,从北京地铁4号线到16号线的轨道交通APP做起,从“鸟巢”这类公共基础设施做起,大量中国城乡的项目都可以做PPP,包括北京必须解决停车场、停车位严重不足的问题,完全可以对接PPP。很多小区改造要在老建筑物上加装电梯,这是进入老龄化社会和现在人民生活标准提高后,普遍要做的升级改造,完全可以把PPP对接到这样的事项上。按老办法依靠政府,不知道多少年后才能达到意愿,用PPP就可以加快和优化,这直接关系到民生改善和社会生活质量和发展环境质量的提高。
第七,创造条件实现人民币资本项目下可兑换势在必行。在人民币国际化过程中,从已经有的周边化、推到越来越高水平的国际化,必须下决心在具备条件时,“自拆防火墙”实行人民币资本项目下可兑换。可以看得很清楚,中国实现现代化,这个关口不过去是无法想象的,但是确实会形成风险压力,类似亚洲金融危机和世界金融危机的情况再发生,防火墙的作用就没有了。我们将要在有能力面对热钱想进就进、想出就出的情况下,来对应索罗斯式金融大鳄热钱的冲击。
最后,把握好发展和规范的关系势在必行。金融创新的很多新领域中,还不知道如何规范的情况下,首先要给出创新试错的弹性空间,大的逻辑是先摆出的是“发展中规范”,允许有发展中的试错,跟着的,是看准了以后一旦必须出手的时候,要以规范发展防范风险。中国的互联网+,典型的是民营企业冲在一线,可扫码支付的微信和阿里的支付宝,有竞争关系,但是合在一起,使中国公众普遍跨越了信用卡普及阶段,非常便捷地得到了金融服务,老百姓在街上手机扫码,可以叫出租车、买煎饼果子,促进了经济的繁荣。但是曾经有微信面对困难的情况,腾讯曾经要把微信卖出去,没人接盘。中移动也搞了飞信,是同一个美国原创技术支持的,但是很难通过必须烧钱的一道道关口,未成气候。当年对微信有人说,会给政府找麻烦,克强总理说了四个字,“审慎包容”,要看看,给出有弹性的空间。冲过了瓶颈以后,这个微信一飞冲天,不光是有便捷的支付服务,而且给老百姓草根层面碎银子提供理财的通道和金融服务,这是原来金融行业中作梦也想不到的服务。这些事情合在一起启发我们:允许试错,给出弹性空间,必须是排第一位的,其后才是八九不离十看清风险后出手规范。比如P2P,后来发现爆雷这样的情况,该出手时就要出手,把防范风险的事情做好。

贾 康 介 绍

第十一届、十二届全国政协委员和政协经济委员会委员,华夏新供给经济学研究院首席经济学家,中国财政科学研究院研究员、博导,中国财政学会顾问,国家发改委PPP专家库专家委员会成员,中国一带一路PPP项目开发委员会委员,中关村公共资源竞争性配置促进中心首席经济学家,北京市、上海市等多地人民政府咨询委员,北京大学、中国人民大学等多家高校特聘教授。1995年享受政府特殊津贴。1997年被评为国家百千万人才工程高层次学术带头人。多次受朱镕基、温家宝、胡锦涛和李克强等中央领导同志之邀座谈经济工作(被媒体称之为“中南海问策”)。担任2010年1月8日中央政治局第十八次集体学习“财税体制改革”专题讲解人之一。孙冶方经济学奖、黄达—蒙代尔经济学奖和中国软科学大奖获得者。国家“十一五”、“十二五”和“十三五”规划专家委员会委员。曾长期担任财政部财政科学研究所所长。1988年曾入选亨氏基金项目,到美国匹兹堡大学做访问学者一年。2013年,主编《新供给:经济学理论的中国创新》,发起成立“华夏新供给经济学研究院”和“新供给经济学50人论坛”(任首任院长、首任秘书长),2015年-2016年与苏京春合著出版《新供给经济学》专著、《供给侧改革:新供给简明读本》、以及《中国的坎:如何跨越“中等收入陷阱”(获评中国图书评论学会和央视的“2016年度中国好书”)》,2016年出版的《供给侧改革十讲》被中组部、新闻出版广电总局和国家图书馆评为全国精品教材。根据《中国社会科学评估》公布的2006~2015年我国哲学社会科学6268种学术期刊700余万篇文献的大数据统计分析,贾康先生的发文量(398篇),总被引频次(4231次)和总下载频次(204115次)均列第一位,综合指数3429,遥居第一,是经济学核心作者中的代表性学者。

(0)

相关推荐

  • 绿维文旅:乡村振兴PPP项目融资渠道解读

    乡村振兴PPP项目主要涉及农村基础设施建设和公共服务设施建设,投资需求量大.期限长,必须深化拓宽融资渠道.<乡村振兴战略规划(2018-2022年)>指出,要"健全投入保障制度, ...

  • 广成明股份参加番禺区先进制造业强区座谈会

    为切实了解全区先进制造业发展现状,听取和解决制造业企业发展面临的各种问题,提振先进制造业企业家发展信心,明确我区先进制造业强区发展方向,更好地布局"十四五"规划期间先进制造业高质量 ...

  • 无论是上千亿的大企业,还是实体店小电商,...

    无论是上千亿的大企业,还是实体店小电商,都玩不动了! 1.一切向钱看,价格导向而不是价值导向已经完全破坏了中国经济生态环境!传统经济的结构和利益分配方式已经走不通了.到今天无论是上千亿的大企业还是街边 ...

  • 贾康:结合海南谈金融创新八个方面势在必行

    本文系贾康先生在"2020海上丝绸之路(海南)金融高峰论坛"上的发言(2020.11.23). 谢谢主持人.尊敬的丁局长.沈市长等到会的各位领导,尊敬的到会的各位专家.嘉宾.各位朋 ...

  • 旧论新提 | 贾康:化解地方债风险八建议

    地方政府隐性负债不透明不规范,制度建设才是化解风险治本之策 总量在安全区之内,并不意味着可以对风险掉以轻心.我认为,相关的风险至少有这么几个方面必须指出: 第一.中国这种为数巨大.18万亿左右的政府债 ...

  • 贾康:中国碳中和50人论坛成立大会致辞(2021,5,8,清华大学经管学院)

    尊敬的杜院长.白院长,到会的各位领导.各位专家.各位嘉宾,各位老师.同学:大家好! 2030年碳达峰而推进到2060年碳中和,是中国作为负责任大国对全世界的庄严承诺,也是中国实现伟大民族复兴现代化战略 ...

  • 贾康:关于“双循环”的认识框架

    本文系贾康先生在全国环境科技大会上的主旨发言(2021,4.19,上海) 谢谢骆秘书长,尊敬的到会各位领导,各位专家,各位企业界市场人士和各位嘉宾朋友,媒体朋友,大家好!很荣幸能有这个机会跟各位做个交 ...

  • 贾康:双循环视域下的三驾马车发展方向

    来源:企业家日报 ■ 贾康  华夏新供给经济学研究院 院长 摘要:需求侧改革的提出与"双循环"新发展格局的指导方针一脉相承,体现进一步着力于打通经济循环中需求潜力释放的堵点.优化全 ...

  • 贾康:在一个低碳发展课题开题会上的发言(2021.5)

    谢谢.我争取尽可能简短地谈谈自己的看法. 讲三个层次,第一个是关于咱们这一课题的审题.我感觉虽然直接表述是碳达峰约束下重点行业煤炭控制路线图,其中的关键词"煤炭"和"路线 ...

  • 贾康:中国碳中和50人论坛成立大会致辞

    尊敬的杜院长.白院长,到会的各位领导.各位专家.各位嘉宾,各位老师.同学:大家好! 2030年碳达峰而推进到2060年碳中和,是中国作为负责任大国对全世界的庄严承诺,也是中国实现伟大民族复兴现代化战略 ...

  • 贾康:双循环格局之下的产业升级

    本文系贾康先生在"2021青岛·全球创投风投大会"上的发言(2021,5.7) 谢谢主持人,大家好!很荣幸参加今天的峰会.我抓紧时间谈一下自己怎么认识"双循环" ...

  • 贾康:在线上讨论会上的发言

    我首先觉得要充分肯定元春校长抓的这样一个研究和交流,作为人大的国家发展和战略研究院做这样一个研究,进一步推动交流讨论,就是针对着一开始元春校长致辞所说的中美关系这个"超级问题",我 ...