【新刊速递】第27期 Cambridge Review of International Affairs, No 1，2020 / 开普饭

期刊简介

《剑桥国际事务评论》（Cambridge Review of International Affairs）于1985年创立，是国际关系同行评审学术期刊，以季刊形式发行。由剑桥大学国际研究中心（现隶属牛津大学政治与国际关系学院）编辑，Routledge出版。据2018Journal Citation Reports显示，影响因子为0.656。

本期编委

【编译】胡贺周心培丁伟航

【审校】丁伟航缪高意朱文菡

【排版】梁鑫昱

本期目录

1. 中美在中国南海交锋：一种国际秩序角度分析

The Sino-American confrontation in the South China Sea: insights from an international order perspective

2. 国有企业对当代世界秩序的影响调查：以中国国企投资加拿大油气行业为例

Investigating the impact of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) on the contemporary world order: a case of Chinese SOE investment in the Canadian hydrocarbon sector

3. 削弱美国结构实力，挑战自由国际秩序：中国对俄罗斯科技和金融领域的国家引导型投资

Challenging the liberal international order by chipping away at US Structural power: China’s state-guided investment in technology and finance in Russia

4. 反对自由国际主义：中国对世界秩序的再商榷

Contesting liberal internationalism: China’s renegotiation of world order

5. 在秩序内竞争？中国、社会化和国际实践

Contesting within order? China, socialisation, and international practice

中美在中国南海交锋：一种国际秩序角度分析

【题目】The Sino-American confrontation in the South China Sea: insights from an international order perspective

【作者】Anisa Heritage, Pak K. Lee（肯特大学）

【摘要】

传统理论认为自2010年以来，中国南海领土争端不断升级的主要原因在于中国在地区的自主性行为。本文超越了传统解释，认为领土争端只是中美建构两种秩序这种更广泛竞争的其中一种表现形式。中国的自主性行为是出于其建立一个“历史的”和“后殖民化的”海洋秩序的愿景，这一秩序以中国中心的南海历史叙事和对1943年至1945年区域秩序历史合法性的强调作为法理前提。相反，以美国为首的“自由主义”海洋秩序则由战后的《旧金山和平条约》《联合国海洋法公约》以及自由航行的理念和实践构成。自2015年10月以来，美国增强了自由航行行动，不断挑战中国“排他性”的海洋或领土主张。作者的结论是，由于中美双方就南海海洋秩序主张无法妥协及其共存的不稳定性，争端有可能走向充满不确定的僵局。

【原文】

Conventional accounts of the South China Sea territorial disputes identify China’s assertive behavior as the primary cause of the rising tension since the early 2010s. This paper goes beyond this traditional interpretation of the disputes by arguing that the territorial disputes are an expression of the broader contestation between two order-building projects by China and the United States (US). China’s assertive behavior originates in its desire to promote a ‘historical’ and ‘post-colonial’ maritime order that is premised on its Sino-centric historical narrative of the Sea and on its emphasis on the historical legitimacy of the regional order of 1943–1945. The US-led ‘liberal’ maritime order is underpinned by a post-war legal framework built on the San Francisco Peace Treaty and the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, and the notion and practice of freedom of navigation. Since October 2015 the US has enhanced its freedom of navigation operations to challenge China’s ‘excessive’ maritime or territorial claims. We conclude that as a result of the uneasy coexistence of these two order-building projects, which fundamentally disagree over the foundations of maritime order in the South China Sea, the disputes have reached an open-ended impasse.

【编译】胡贺

【审校】朱文菡

国有企业对当代世界秩序的影响调查：以中国国企投资加拿大油气行业为例

【题目】Investigating the impact of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) on the contemporary world order: a case of Chinese SOE investment in the Canadian hydrocarbon sector

【作者】Anastasia Ufimtseva（威尔弗雷德·劳里大学）

【摘要】

在一些资源富集的国家，中国国有企业（SOE）已经成为重要的海外直接投资来源。SOE投资的扩张已经在西半球引发人们讨论：SOE会挑战自由主义的经济实践吗？会改变投资对象国的国内治理吗？本文通过考察中国SOE投资加拿大油气行业（hydrocarbon sector）的案例，以推进这场讨论。本文援引了世界秩序、国际商贸及国际关系相关的文献，借以审视SOE投资对西半球投资所在国的影响。我认为，加拿大对SOE投资的回应偏于审慎，这为制度创新留下空间。政府可由此对SOE投资实施更严格的监管。我提议，更加严格的监管可被视作对自由主义经济实践的支持，不过，它也可能起到意想不到的相反效果。

【原文】

Chinese state-owned enterprises (SOEs) have become an important source of foreign direct investment (FDI) in resource-rich countries. Their expansion has stirred a debate in the Western hemisphere about the ability of SOEs to challenge liberal economic practices and to alter domestic governance in the countries where they invest. This paper contributes to this debate by examining the case of Chinese SOE investment in the Canadian hydrocarbon sector. It uses insights from the literature on the world order, international business, and international relations to examine the impact of SOE investment on a host country in the Western hemisphere. As I argue, the Canadian response to SOE’s investment has been on the cautionary side, which opens avenues for institutional innovation that leads to stricter regulations of SOEs’ FDI. As I propose, stricter regulations can be reinterpreted as an attempt to support liberal economic practices, yet may unintentionally have the opposite effect.

【编译】周心培

【审校】缪高意

削弱美国结构实力，挑战自由国际秩序：中国对俄罗斯科技和金融领域的国家引导型投资

【题目】Challenging the liberal international order by chipping away at US Structural power: China’s state-guided investment in technology and finance in Russia

【作者】Anton Malkin（国际治理创新中心）

【摘要】

本文以中国对俄罗斯的投资为例，就中国对自由秩序的挑战进行了案例研究。它将中国国有企业的政经状况置于全球背景下调查，而国企是中国对俄投资的主要工具。报告认为，中国对俄投资正日益成为自由国际秩序的结构性经济挑战。中国对俄投资的趋势表明，中国政府促进全球经济一体化的战略最终可能不符合自由国际秩序的地缘政治基础。它考察了中国对俄投资的两个案例：科技领域和金融领域。这表明，自由秩序与中国应对全球化战略的紧张关系，其根源在于其对美国结构力量的影响；该挑战正体现在中国的国家引导型资本在俄罗斯高科技发展和金融体系中的活跃存在。

【原文】

This paper examines China’s investments in Russia as a case study of China’s challenge to the liberal order. It surveys the political economy of China’s stateowned enterprises—the primary vehicles for China’s investments in Russia—in a global context. It argues that China’s investments in Russia constitute an emerging structural economic challenge to the liberal international order. The trend of China’s investments in Russia illustrates Beijing’s strategy of fostering global economic integration that ultimately may not conform to the geopolitical underpinnings of a liberal international order. It looks at two cases of China’s investments in Russia: the technology sector and the financial sector. It shows that the liberal order’s tension with China’s strategy vis-à-vis globalization is rooted in its impact on US structural power and suggests that the active presence of Chinese state-guided capital in Russia’s hightech development and its financial system illustrate the nature of this challenge.

【编译】周心培

【审校】缪高意

在秩序内竞争？中国、社会化和国际实践

【题目】Contesting within order? China, socialisation, and international practice

【作者】Catherine Jones（圣安德鲁斯大学）

【摘要】

关于中国参与国际制度的争论焦点是（错误的）二分法，即中国要么是维持现状的大国，要么是修正主义大国。这场争论的双方都有足够的经验证据来支持他们的论点，而且他们倾向于得出这样的结论，即中国的行为和偏好介于这两种立场之间。需要重点考虑的是中国如何通过国际制度挑战国际秩序。本文研究了这样一个问题：中国正在融入什么？在分析国际实践研究文献的基础上，本文剖析了中国可能融入的规范类型。本文认为中国已经成功地融入了国际制度的实践（官僚机构的运作及实现其政治目标的方式）和自由多元主义的全球规范中，但尚未完全融入社会连带主义者的的自由规范。

【原文】

Debates on China’s engagement with international institutions centre on a (false) dichotomy that China is either a status-quo or revisionist power. Both sides of this debate have ample empirical evidence to support their arguments and they tend towards conclusions that China’s behaviour and preferences lie in the space in between these two positions. It is important to consider how China presents a contest to international order from with international institutions.This article examines the question: What is China being socialised into? Drawing on the international practices literature, this paper unpacks the types of norms that China may be being socialised into. It makes the argument that China has been successfully socialised into the practices of international institutions – the ways the bureaucracies work and can be used to achieve political goals – and pluralist-liberal global norms, but incompletely into solidarist liberal norms.

【编译】丁伟航

【审校】朱文菡

本文由国政学人独家编译推荐，文章观点不代表本平台观点。